To Blend or not To Blend



To Blend or not To Blend, that's the question as Shakespeare might have put it if he would have been an enthusiastic whisky drinker, which, I believe, he was not. But the question popped up yesterday evening when I tasted the William Lawson's Blend for the first time. Lately I have been testing a large number of the so called Bottom Shelf Blends and they all end up at the bottom of my Whisky League Table. It's not that you can't drink them but they don't give you any pleasure when you drink them. They all more or less taste like plates of sugared breakfast cereals with a bit of salt and some added oak/spice flavouring. So their only advantage is that they are relatively cheap. Now I know that more or less 90% of all whiskies sold world wide belong to the above mentioned category. I also believe that in the majority of cases these whiskies are not devoured straight but either on the rocks or in Long Drinks or mixed with cola or other soft - or energy drinks. I have tried to do that as well but I believe that other spirits such as Rum or Bourbon are more suited for this purpose because of their inherent sweetness. 
Based on the above it's easy to see the economic advantages for the industry as they are selling huge quantities of standardised product all around the world. Much cheaper to concentrate your marketing efforts on a couple of well known Brand names. But from the point of view of somebody who loves to taste and enjoy well made whiskies, either blends or Single Malts and either produced in Scotland or elsewhere around the globe, it's difficult to appreciate the fact that 40 or more Malt - and Grain Whiskies are blended and married only to result in an indifferent end product with no real own identity.
Of course it's possible to create good blends as well. And they are available in the market. But with the exception of Johnnie Walker Black they are quite expensive and can be compared price wise to a large number of Single Malts. And although I can understand that there will be people who will drink say JW Green or Gold or Ballantine's 17 Years for all their lives as it gives them the comfort of a well made dram, I personally prefer to spend my money on good whiskies from around the globe. It's tasting the differences between regions and distilleries and wood that makes drinking whisky a real pleasure.
Now I also realise that Single Malt whisky in general is getting really expensive these days because of the growing world demand. It's clear therefore that the vast majority of whisky consumers will keep buying affordable blends. So I can only wish that at some point in time the industry will succeed in offering (at a reasonable price) blended whiskies where the sweet taste will remind me of fruit or Sherry  instead of sugar, where Malt instead of Grain rules and where some Oak at least will remind me of quality casks. Or am I dreaming here!


Jan

Crosby Stills & Nash I Review

Hi Everybody,
Welcome to the Paradise on this fine Saturday morning. As you know Classic Rock from the Sixties and the Seventies is another passion of mine and today I would like to present to you my Review of the first Crosby Stills & Nash Album recorded in 1969. These guys are all time favourites of mine and very few albums come close to, let alone match the sheer Paradise of the harmony vocals offered by David Crosby, Stephen Stills and Graham Nash. David the Dreamer, Stephen the Captain and Graham the Ecologist. What a chemistry existed between those three. They still perform but obviously age does count and I prefer to hear them at their best in the late sixties and early seventies.
So have fun reading the Review. Tonight I will start tasting William Lawson's Blended Scotch Whisky. Have a nice Saturday and see you all back tomorrow,
Saude!
Jan

Crosby Stills & Nash I - 1969


Songs: Suite: Judy Blue Eyes, Marrakesh Express, Guinnevere, You don´t have to Cry, Pre-Road Downs, Wooden Ships, Lady of the Island, Helplessly Hoping, Long Time Gone, 49 Bye-Byes.

Type of Music: Folk/Rock with a slight touch of Acid. 

Comments:
For me Crosby, Stills & Nash are the true representatives of the Woodstock Generation. Peace, Love and Harmony!! It´s not too acid like Jefferson Airplane or Grateful Dead nor too sweet like Joan Baez. But their music fits perfectly with those long gone Summers of Love.
The combination of the writing and musical skills of Stephen Stills (ex Buffalo Springfield), David Crosby (ex Byrds) and Graham Nash (ex Hollies) produced some of the greatest music of the late sixties, carried by their unique harmonies. Their Debut Album is packed with those songs.

Shortly afterwards, Neil Young joined the band and the power struggle for control over the band between him and Stephen began.
Maybe because of that, our friends would never again be quite able to capture beauty, innocence and delicacy and transform them in sheer musical heaven.        

Stephen contributes most of the songs here. With the exception of  49 Bye-Byes they are all great. Most of you will know Suite: Judy Blue Eyes written for Judy Collins. But also enjoy little pearls like You don´t  have to Cry and Helplessly Hoping. Graham gives us the happy hash song Marrakesh Express and the honest Lady of the Island. And David wrote the beautiful ballad Guinnevere for all his past, present and future wives, lovers and girlfriends. You remember the Woodstock movie? It still gives me the creeps when the film starts and you hear David´s Long Time Gone.

And then, there´s the best of them all. The slightly psychedelic anthem Wooden Ships, co-written with Paul Kantner from Jefferson Airplane.
It´s about the world or what´s left of it after the Big Bang. Actually our friends got some criticism as the song contains the line: We are leaving, You Don´t Need Us.
But I don´t care about that. I love the song and it´s in my all time Top 10 of Classic Rock songs.

What else is there to say. If you don´t own this album you should do something about that. And Quick!!!!!  

Rating: ********* (9 out of 10)

Black = Good Songs
Green = Great Songs
Red = Could Be Better

Who should buy this RecordEverybody.

Teacher's Highland Cream Review (Bottled in Brazil)


Country: Distilled, Aged and Blended in Scotland. Mixed with water and bottled in Brazil by Allied Domecq Brazil.
Brand: Teacher’s Highland Cream (Wm. Teacher & Sons Ltd.)
Type: Blended Whisky
Age: Unspecified but probably between 3 and 8 Years
Alcohol: 40%

Colour: Pale Gold

Nose: First impressions are Grains, Malt and Light Peat and Smoke. A bit of young Oak, harsh Alcohol, Vanilla and Spices.

Taste: Sugared lamp oil sprinkled with low quality pepper. Bit of Green Oak and Licorice.

Finish: It’s like holding a lump of sugar in your mouth that is slowly melting and is followed by something that resembles hot and bitter candle wax. Some Oak and Licorice as well. No use to spoil water on this blend!

Rating: 63

Nose: 17 - Taste: 15 - Finish: 15 - Overall: 16

General Remarks: Teacher’s Highland Cream is said to have a Malt content of around 45%, very high for a blended whisky. At its heart is the Ardmore Highland Distillery where the blend is produced. Glendronach is another important ingredient. Its nose should reveal Smoke and Chocolate and Butterscotch and Lemon and its taste should be creamy with Toffee and Sherry and Fruit with hints of Peat and Smoke. I can’t find anything like it in my glass today.

Drinking Experience Neat: Well Below Average.

Hey! Teacher! Leave them kids alone!

Conclusion: I really don’t know if, and if yes, what happened with this whisky between it being distilled in Scotland and bottled in Brazil. Is only water added to the mixture received from Scotland? Because I find it hard to believe that I am drinking the same whisky that is highly praised in so many parts of the world. Or did I get a bad - or falsified bottle or something? I tasted a second bottle in September 2013. I wasn't that horrified this time, slightly adjusted the Tasting Notes and increased the Final score to 63 points. Still well below average of course. Not a Blend I can recommend, at least not the way it's marketed in Brazil.

Jan van den Ende                                 January 18, 2012/September 27 2013

J and B Rare Blended Scotch Review


Country: Scotland
Brand: J&B Rare (Justerini & Brooks)
Type: Blended Whisky
Age: Unspecified but probably between 3 and 8 Years
Alcohol: 40%

Colour: Light Gold

Nose: Average. I am welcomed by wafts of sharp Alcohol. I’m fighting my way through and find Corn Flakes with Sugar and a touch of Salt. I suspect the presence of many young Grain whiskies in this blend. Bit of Malt, Nuts and young Wood. Light Vanilla. There are some Fruity tones in the back but the Alcohol makes it difficult to identify them. Green Apples probably.

Taste: Thin delivery. Sugary Caramel with Hot Spices and rough Wood dipped in raw Alcohol.

Finish: Sweet as Candy. Bit of Honey and Oak. Stubborn Alcohol!

When you add a bit of water, it helps to drown the sharp Alcohol on the nose and I also smell a bit of Lemon. On the palate it waters things down on the one hand but it also makes the Caramel slightly less sugary. You can experiment a bit with water on this blend if you like.

Rating: 74,5

Nose: 19 – Taste: 19 – Finish: 18 – Overall: 18,5

General Remarks: This blend is the second best selling blended alcohol in the world! It’s hard to believe! Only Johnnie Walker Red Label sells more. Much more actually. But Still! It’s very popular in Spain but I’m sure they mostly mix it with something down there. The very sweet delivery makes it suitable for mixing I suppose. At its heart lies the Speyside distillery Knockando (Diageo).

There are over 40 Malt – and Grain whiskies in this blend and it’s been around since 1900 or so. But I fail to see the relevance of mixing so many whiskies to get such an indifferent end result. It must be me!

Drinking Experience Neat: Average/Good


Conclusion: Some guy (I believe from Balvenie) once said that whisky is liquid muesli. He’s got a point there. But there are many flavors available to transform your basic muesli into a very special breakfast. However, these flavors are not part of the J&B Rare Blend I’m afraid. It’s just your basic grains with a bit of sugar and some salt. It’s drinkable of course but it does not make me scream out for more.

Jan van den Ende                                                                January 16, 2012

Knockando Distillery

Yamazaki 12 Years Review

Country: Japan
Brand: Suntory Yamazaki
Type: Single Malt Whisky
Age: 12 Years
Alcohol: 43%

Color: Light Gold

Nose: Crisp and not too heavy. Malt, Cherries, Light Peat, Cinnamon, Blossom and Quality Oak are the first impressions followed by Honey and Tropical Fruit (Banana, Coconut and Pineapple). A bit of Alcohol but certainly within limits. Dried Fruits. The Honey and Floral tones on the nose are similar to Speyside malts. But with the Yamazaki we get Tropical Fruits instead of Sherry and the Wood is certainly different. Still, it would be difficult to keep them apart at a blind tasting session.

Taste: Strong delivery thanks to the 43%. Sweet Grain, Honey, Toffee and Dry Oak with Cinnamon, Cloves, Ginger, Nutmeg and Pepper. A whisky to chew on! The strong presence of Fine Oak sets this whisky apart from others tasted so far.

Finish: Sweet at first but dry towards the end. Honey, Apple and Oak. Very faint Peat and Ashes. Notes of Tea, Nuts and Tobacco. White Pepper to finish it off. But it all fades away too fast unfortunately.


When adding a bit of water, the Floral tones and Peat start dominating the nose. The palate becomes very smooth and honeyed and the Oak disappears to the background. I prefer it straight but you can certainly experiment with a bit of water. Just never overdo it!

Rating: 86,5

Nose: 21.5 – Taste: 22.5 - Finish: 21 - Overall: 21.5

General Remarks: The first malt whisky distillery in Japan was constructed by the Suntory Founder Shinjiro Torii in 1923 in the Yamazaki Valley close to the city of Kyoto. The place was chosen because its water, soil and climate were similar to Scotland. It was the first distillery of this kind outside Scotland and it used copper pot stills. Today the Suntory Yamazaki is the most popular Single Malt in Japan and it is exported to more than 25 countries.

Since 1972 Suntory is importing its malted barley from Scotland and Australia. The spirit is aged in a mixture of casks from American -, Spanish – and Japanese Oak.

Drinking Experience Neat:  Good

Conclusion: It doesn’t happen a lot but the Yamazaki 12 Years scored better on the palate than on the nose. The nose is crisp and tropical along with Speyside Blossom and Honey, but it’s the palate that steals the show combining rich sweet Honey and Toffee with a handful of Spices and a first class dry Oak. Nice combination. The finish is dry and agreeable but way too short. What stands out in this Single Malt is the Wood Quality. If you like the Balvenie DoubleWood 12 Years or Glenmorangie Original 10 Years, you really should give the Yamazaki a chance although it is more expensive!

Jan van den Ende                                                              January 12, 2012

Sgt.Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - Review




Sgt.Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - Beatles (1967)

Songs:  Sgt. Pepper´s Lonely Hearts Club Band, With a Little Help from my Friends, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, Getting Better, Fixing a Hole, She´s Leaving Home, Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite, Within You Without You, When I´m Sixty-Four, Lovely Rita, Good Morning Good Morning, Sgt. Pepper´s Lonely Hearts Club Band Reprise, A Day in the Life.

Type of Music: Quality Pop with Psychedelic Influences.

Comments
It´s been called by some the greatest record ever made. Others consider it to be the first concept album. Many people regard it to be the best of the  Beatles Records.
Well, for me it´s non of the above. It´s not in my All Time Top 10 of Classic Rock Albums. And the fact that the title track is revisited at the end of the album is clearly not enough to consider Sgt. Pepper to be a Concept Album. There are too many styles represented here. And, for me at least, the best of the Beatles was still to come.     

Since we have now established what Sgt. Pepper is not, we can concentrate on what it does represent. First of all I consider it to be a Work of Art. Never before in my opinion was so much attention paid to the presentation of a record. I´m sure that many of you can at least partly describe the cover of the Album. The same attention was paid to the sound quality.

Sgt. Pepper is also a fine collection of songs. The variety of styles avoid the record to become boring even after many spins. There is the acid-rock of Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, the Indian Chant Within You Without You written by George, the Circus Music of Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite, the Vaudeville of When I´m Sixty-Four, the power pop of Lovely Rita and the sad but lovely pop-ballad She´s Leaving Home.

There are a few minus points as well. Everybody who saw the Woodstock movie will agree that Joe Cocker made With a little help from my Friends his Song. Sorry Ringo!!
I also rate Good Morning Good Morning as a weaker song and the reprise of Sgt. Pepper is irrelevant.
And although I consider A Day in the Life one of the best songs on the record, there are inexplicable irritating flaws in the way John´s voice was recorded.

But these observations do not prevent Sgt. Pepper from being an essential Beatles Album. As such it should be part of any Pop/Rock collection.       

Black = Good Songs
Green = Great Songs
Red = Could Be Better

Rating:******** (8 out of 10)

Who should buy this Record: Everybody. 

Whisky and Sulphur



In my tasting notes I have frequently complained about a certain nutty bitterness that seem to be present in some way or another in a lot of whiskies, most of them (though not all) having matured for some considerable time in used sherry - and or wine casks. I also found it in some Bourbons by the way. In all cases I did not like it at all and found that it could really spoil the nosing and tasting experience. I certainly would not buy these whiskies again if I could help it. Problem is that I don't really know what causes this bitterness. 
One of the possible villains is sulphur dioxide. This product is used in vineyards to prevent the growing grapes from oxidising. It is also added to Wine and Sherry Casks to kill bacterias. Or maybe it is added to all casks these days with food safety and all. 
Now the funny thing is that apparently not everybody is able to pick up the smell of sulphur unless it has reached the rotten egg stage where it is hard not to detect it. This seems to be a genetic issue although experiments show that smokers and heavy coffee - and/or black tea drinkers have more trouble identifying it. Most people who do detect it compare the smell with burnt matches and/or flints. Some people even like a bit of it in their whisky as it adds another component just like peat or smoke or iodine, also stuff that not everybody cares for. Some people believe we should be advised via the label if and when a whisky contains sulphur.
As I said, I'm not really sure if it's the sulphur that causes the bitter taste and finish in many whiskies I've tasted so far. But if the answer is yes, I believe the industry should start looking for odourless - and tasteless alternatives as the sulphur may drive many new consumers away from our fine spirit.



Jan

Blanton's Single Barrel Review


Country: USA
Brand: Blanton’s Single Barrel
Type: Kentucky Straight Bourbon
Age: Not Specified
Alcohol: 40%
Date: 08/01/2012

Colour: Deep Red Amber

Nose: Pleasant sweet nose with Corn, Vanilla, Honey, Light Spice (Cinnamon) and fresh Oak. There’s fruit as well but I’m not able to pin it down exactly. Could be Pear, could be Apple, could be Strawberry. A Fruit Cocktail with Honey, Cinnamon and a touch of mint! “Problem” solved.
There are many people that have visions of glue when smelling Bourbons and there’s certainly something to that. But whatever you want to call it, Blanton’s nose is both pleasing and addictive!

Taste:  Blanton’s coats your mouth but I would not call it extremely smooth. It’s too dry for that and not at all as sweet as you would expect after nosing. There is a quick sensation of Honey and Caramel (Burnt Sugar) but the spices are there at once and in force, including Pepper, Ginger and Nutmeg. And Cherries appear, loads of cherries! And there’s this slightly nutty bitterness I find too often in whiskies and Bourbons. And I can’t say I like it a lot.

Finish: Long and quite dry with Corn, Cinnamon, a bit of Pepper and Oak. But it’s the Cherries, Mint and Lime that seem to last forever.

Don’t add water to the Blanton’s! It starts tasting like watery muesli with cherry flavor!

Rating:  83,5 
Nose: 22– Taste: 20– Finish: 21– Overall: 20,5

General Remarks: Blanton was the first Single Barrel Bourbon back in 1984. All major competitors followed in due course. It’s made of Corn, Rye and malted Barley. It’s filtered with Charcoal and is produced by the Buffalo Trace Distillery in Frankfort, Franklin County, Kentucky. The bottle I’m testing today is numbered 282 and was dumped on February 26, 2007 from Barrel No. 31 that was stored in Warehouse H at rick number 3. Each Blanton bottle stopper has a small horse and jockey on top. They became the trademark for this Bourbon. There are 8 different ones each mentioning one letter of the word Blanton’s. All horses and riders show different strides inspired of course by the famous Kentucky Derby.


Drinking Experience Neat: Good
Drinking Experience on the Rocks: Good

Conclusion: Very pleasant nose indeed. But the taste and finish are too dry despite the long-lasting cherries in the finish. This Bourbon really leaves you with a very dry mouth and a bitter aftertaste. This extreme dryness and the slightly unpleasant nutty bitterness prevent Blanton’s Single Barrel from a higher score. Next barrel please!

Jan van den Ende                                                            January 2012

Johnnie Walker Green Label Review


Country: Scotland
Brand: Johnnie Walker Green Label  
Type: Blended Whisky
Age: 15 Years
Alcohol: 40%

Colour: Amber

Nose: Malted Barley, Heather and Peat are followed by Oak, Sherry, Oranges, Raisins and Caramel. There’s some Alcohol but nothing to get upset about. You have to be very patient and persevering to get round these initial flavors but after quite a while I detected hints of Coffee, Leather and Tobacco. Very light Spices.

Taste: Very smooth and sweet though a bit watery delivery with Honey and Toffee, followed by Cinnamon and Pepper. Much sweeter than I’d expected actually after the nose. A light saltiness appears. Grapefruit, Nuts, Oak and Tobacco. Again I would like to stress that a blend of this quality should be bottled at (at least) 43%.

You may add some water that will release even more Heather, Honey and Peat but be careful! A drop too much and the palate is gone. I prefer it without water to better enjoy the Talisker Pepper that provides a welcome counterbalance for the Honey and Malt from Cragganmore. I would have liked to find a bit more Smoke. Caol Ila does bring (more than) sufficient Peat and a slight saltiness.

Finish: Good, Long but Very Dry. A combination of Honey, Cinnamon and Pepper. Smoke and Ashes from a very distant fire.

Rating: 86,5

Nose: 21,5 – Taste: 21,5 – Finish: 22 – Overall: 21,5

General Remarks: Green Label is the only JW blend made purely of Single Malts. Four of them actually, from all main Scottish production areas: Talisker, Cragganmore, Linkwood and Caol Ila. The blend was introduced around 1995. Unfortunately,Diageo has decided to take the Green out of production. The reason could be that the middle market goes for Black and the Upper Market for Blue and Gold. And Green is too expensive for the Middle Market and not expensive enough for the Upper Market. Result: Disappointing Sales. Well, I do believe indeed that the Green is too expensive when compared to the Black.
But it’s also a quite different blend and as such deserves its place in the JW range. It 's a pity to see it go!

Drinking Experience Neat: Good

Conclusion: I really struggled with this one during the last two nights. I heard so much positive opinions about the Green Label that I was really excited about tasting it. Did I set the bar too high? Probably. I have to admit that I was a bit disappointed. Let me start with the good news. The Finish is without any doubt the best from the Johnnie Walkers I’ve tasted so far. And the Blue label is the only one left untested. Nice combination of sweet, salt and Pepper. If anything, maybe a wee bit too dry. As for the nose, it’s nice enough but I found the Barley and Peat too dominant.  On the palate I thought the sweetness to be a bit overdone. Don’t get me wrong, the Green Label is a very good blend but I still think it can’t beat the Black Label in terms of both harmony and adventure. And I also think that the palate of the Swing is more to the point. It is of course all very personal in the end. But if you prefer Honey and Sweet you should go for the Green and the Gold. If you like a bit more Smoke, than the Black and the Swing are your choices of a good blend. Black, Green, Gold and Swing. You can’t go wrong with any of them. In fact they beat many Single Malts and there aren’t that many blends that achieve that. But with the exception of Black, you will need to dig deep in your pocket! However, the Green won't be around for much longer, so it's now or never!
 
Jan van den Ende                                                               January 6, 2012    

Led Zeppelin I - Review



Album: Led Zeppelin by Led Zeppelin (1969)

Produced by: Jimmy Page for Atlantic Records.

The Band: Jimmy Page ( Guitars and Backing Vocals), Robert Plant (Vocals, Harmonica) John Paul Jones (Bass, Organ, Backing Vocals) John Bonham (Drums, Percussion, Backing Vocals).  

Songs: Good Times Bad Times, Babe I’m Gonna Leave You, You Shook Me, Dazed and Confused, Your Time is Gonna Come, Black Mountain Side, Communication Breakdown, I Can’t Quit You Baby, How Many More Times.

Best Song:  The Trilogy: Babe I’m Gonna Leave You/You Shook Me/Dazed and Confused.

Type of Music: Hard Rock and Blues mixed with bits and pieces of Progressive Rock and Folk.

Comments:
Extravagant, Loud, Decadent, Uncompromising, Bombastic, Heavy. All these qualifications come to my mind when thinking about the music of Led Zeppelin. Although they could also be precise and subtle demonstrating their obvious love for the acoustic guitar and English folk music. They were glam-rockers, punks and abused booze, drugs and hotel rooms. They were not particularly good at song-writing and ripped off old blues songs and folk originals. But Jimmy Page and Robert Plant did manage to transform those songs in dark and mystical works of art. Many bands have tried to copy their style in the seventies and eighties but none was able to come close. The combination of Page and Plant simply was unique!

Like so many bands in the late sixties and early seventies, Led’s debut album was heavenly influenced by the blues with lyrics that tell the tale of lost love, treason and loneliness. And three of these blues songs, I Can’t Quit You Baby written by Otis Rush, How Many More Times by Howling Wolf and the obscure You Shook Me form the basis for the album and are surrounded by a couple of fast and furious pop rock songs, a folk instrumental, an acoustic ballad and some psychedelic prog- rock.
The combination of songs however makes it a nearly perfect listen and Led Zeppelin I (One) will always remain one of my favourite classic rock albums.
As so often happened, the band would struggle to match the quality of their debut album. They would surprise us with many great songs in the years to come but they would never again make such a coherent album.

So let’s have a look at the individual songs:

The album starts of with the single Good Times Bad Times (Nr. 80 Billboard). It’s really a simple but agreeable pop song dressed up as hard rock.

But then we are surprised with around 20 minutes of absolute heaven for classic rock lovers. The trilogy starts off with the acoustic blues ballad Babe I’m Gonna Leave You. Never again Robert Plant would sound so honestly and convincingly depressed as here. You can almost feel his broken heart although I’m not quite sure he’s leaving her in the end. Later on in their career, Robert would overdo the wailing and the songs would almost become parodies. But not so here. Great song!

It is followed by the first and best of the three blues songs You Shook Me. The band plays extremely tight on this one. They almost sound like a  machine, with pounding drums, great bass lines and the perfect interplay between Jimmy’s guitar and Robert’s voice. And watch out for those organ and harmonica solos as well!

To finish the trilogy we get Dazed and Confused the heaviest track on the album. It’s bluesy and psychedelic and fast and furious sometimes. It’s amazing!

None of the following tracks come close although none of them is really bad. The first one is Your Time is Gonna Come and the organ intro played by John Paul Jones is the best part of the song really.

The following Black Mountain Side is an instrumental folk song with some Indian influences creating an atmosphere not unlike some of George Harrison’s later work with the Beatles.

Communication Breakdown is hard rocking and to the point and I Can’t Quit You Baby is the second great blues song. It’s more relaxed and less compact than You Shook Me but still great.

And the album closes with the blues-shuffle How Many More Times that starts of quite gentle but explodes later on. It’s probably the only song on the album I could live without although it has its moments.

Rating: ********* (9 out of 10)

Black = Good Songs
Green = Great Songs
Red = Could Be Better

Sound Quality: Excellent. Be sure to get the re-mastered version.

Chart Success: The album made it to number 10 in the Billboard Album Top 200.

Who should buy this Record:  Everybody!!  Led Zeppelin’s Best Album and one of the true Classic Rock Albums of All Time. Get It Now!

Jan van den Ende , 2010

Cutty Sark Review


Country: Scotland
Brand: Cutty Sark
Type: Blended Whisky by Berry Bros & Rudd, London
Age: Not Specified
Alcohol: 40%

Colour: Pale Gold

Nose: As always give your whisky sufficient time to open up before nosing. I recommend at least 20 minutes. The Cutty Sark certainly does not present an impressive nose with Malt, Sweet Grain (Breakfast Cereals), Citrus and Oak. There is Alcohol but not as much of it when compared to various other blends in the same price range. At some point I thought I nosed Apple Pie with Raisins and Cream but it’s not consistently there. There’s also something nasty that I can only describe as morning sickness after a stiff night on the town if you know what I mean. Quite a mixed bag that we have here!

Taste: Delivery is a bit thin. Sweet, Simple but Drinkable with some Light Spices, Honeyed Grains, Extra Sweet Toffee and Apple.

Finish: The honey/sugar sticks to the palate for a while followed by Oak and the unpleasant Nutty Bitterness that is so common in Standard Blends and for which I have deducted a full point.

I would not recommend adding water to the Cutty Sark although you get a little bit more fruit (Melon) on the nose. But you completely destroy the  taste.

Rating: 76 

Nose: 19,5 – Taste: 19,5–  Finish: 18 – Overall: 19

General Remarks: This blend was created in 1923, at first especially for export to the USA during the Prohibition. The logo represents a drawing of a Sailing Ship constructed in Scotland in 1869 that bore the same name. The name, bottle and brand mark remind me a bit of pirates and smuggling.




Today the blend is still popular in the USA, but also in countries like Spain and Portugal where it is often mixed.

The blend consists of a number of grain whiskies plus around 20 Single Malts, mainly from Speyside. At its heart lies Glenrothes. Other renowned contributions are Tamdhu, Highland Park, Macallan and Bunnahabhain. The grain whiskies are blended first together as are the Single Malts. Afterwards they are then “married” together.

Drinking Experience Straight: Average/Good (Average because of the bitter finish)

Drinking Experience on the Rocks: Average

Conclusion: Cutty Sark is not an expensive whisky and as such it holds its ground when compared to direct competitors such as Dewar’s White Label, Grant’s Family Reserve, Ballantine’s Finest, Chivas Regal 12 Years, White Horse, the Famous Grouse and Johnnie Walker Red Label. Still it’s depressing when you realise that 90% of all whiskies sold worldwide are blends, many of them of comparable quality, quite a few of them better but lots of them worse as the subject of this review. Anyway, Cutty Sark is an acceptable blend given its competitive pricing. It has some Speyside-like sweetness on the palate and some citrus on the nose. There are some off-notes as well, respectively on the nose (Morning Sickness) and in the Finish (Nutty Bitterness). If you go for cheap and reasonable, Cutty Sark could be your blended whisky of choice. Or you could save a bit longer and buy yourself a Deluxe blend or a Single Malt. Guess what I would do!!!

Jan van den Ende                                                                   January 1, 2012