Longrow 11 Years Red Cabernet Sauvignon Cask Whisky Review

Country: Scotland 

Region: Campbeltown

Brand: Longrow Red Cabernet Sauvignon Cask

Type: Single Malt Whisky

Age: 11 Years

ABV:  52.1 %

Date: 18/02/2013

Colour: Reddish Gold/Copper

Nose: Take your time because the first impression is Peat. Lovely, fat succulent Peat. Then, after quite a while, Malt and Red Fruits like Cranberries and Raspberries arrive, followed by Oak, Caramel, Butterscotch, cured Bacon, Butter, Coal, Fresh Grapefruit Juice and Salted Smoked Mackerel. Some Floral tones in the background. Very complex Nose but it needs time. Don't rush it because if you do that you could easily write it off as an aggressive Peatbull!

Palate: Strong and Full delivery with Peat, Red Fruit and Red Wine, Caramel, Orange, Black Pepper, Cardamom and Cinnamon, Oak, Leather, Salt and Bitter Chocolate.

Finish: Very Long and Dry with Red Fruit, Red Wine, Peat, Charred Oak, Nuts, Menthol, Salt/Brine, Black Pepper, Smoked Bacon and light Medicinal Notes.

With a bit of water, you get a bit of extra Malt and Buttered Toast on the Nose. On the Palate the Red Wine becomes more evident. The Finish almost disappears apart from a bit of Licorice, Red Wine/Fruit and Spices. I would advise you to drink this dram neat to be able to fully enjoy all of the intended flavour combinations.  

Rating: 88.5 (out of 100)

Nose: 22.5 - Taste: 22 - Finish: 22 - Overall: 22

Springbank Distillery

General Remarks: The Longrow peated Single Malt is produced at the Springbank Distillery. It is named after the old Longrow distillery that was located close to the Springbank distillery. The Longrow Red matured for 7 years in refill Bourbon Barrels and was finished for another 4 years in Cabernet Sauvignon hogsheads. The Red is a limited edition that was distilled in 2005 and bottled in 2012. I believe only 9000 bottles were marketed word wide. The price amounts to around 70 US Dollars.

Drinking Experience Neat: Very Good

Conclusion: People that follow my Notes on a regular basis already know that, generally speaking, I'm not a huge fan of Red Wine finishing. Let  wine be wine and whisky be whisky! But there are always exceptions to every rule and the Longrow Red is such an exception. Very nice interplay between the quality Peat and the Red Fruit and Red Wine Components. And there's a Salty Maritime element present that makes it all even more interesting. It's not an everyday dram but something to enjoy on special occasions. If you love a complex and peated whisky with nice Red Fruit and Red Wine tones, go for this one. I fully recommend the Longrow 11 Red Cabernet Sauvignon Cask!

Jan van den Ende                                                                   February 2013

Campbeltown

Loch Lomond Review

Country: Scotland 

Region: Highlands

Brand: Loch Lomond

Type: Single Malt Whisky

Age: NAS 

ABV: 40 %

Colour:  Gold/Amber

Nose: Quite Light. I find Toast with a Butter/Margarine Mixture, Bitter Wood (Shavings), Sweet Barley, Resin and a little Caramel, Heather, Vanilla, and Leather. A bit Musty as well. This is mostly Grain and Wood. Not very interesting.

Palate: Soft and Bitter Sweet with Sweet Barley, Sugar, Nuts, Licorice, Lemon-Pepper and Menthol.

Finish: Dry and Middle-Long with Lemon, Sugared Nuts, Dried Fruits (Raisins and Currants), Menthol and Cocoa Powder.

I added a bit of water and the Nose becomes a mixture of Grains and Caramel with a bit of Margarine on top. More Mint and Menthol on the Palate. The Finish gets a bit watery. There's room to experiment with a few drops.

Rating: 74

Nose: 19 - Taste:  18- Finish: 18.5 - Overall: 18.5

General Remarks: The Loch Lomond distillery was built in 1965. It closed between 1984 and 1987. It is currently owned by Glen Catrine Bonded Warehouse Ltd in Alexandria, Scotland. In various types of stills the distillery produces both Grain - and Malt whiskies under a variety of Brand names such as Croftengea, Inchmurrin, Inchmoan, Craiglodge, Inchfad, Old Rhosdhu, Scots Earl and High Commissioner. Remember the stories and films of Tintin? Check it out, Captain Haddock's favourite whisky was the Loch Lomond!

Drinking Experience Neat: Average

Conclusion: Not interesting enough for a Single Malt. It's not very expensive at around 35 US Dollars but still. The Nose is very light and mainly consists of Grain and Wood. Soft and Bitter-Sweet on the Palate. The Finish is actually slightly more interesting on account of the somewhat refreshing Menthol and Mint notes, especially when a couple of drops of Water are added. On the whole however we can archive this one for always and ever. I'm sorry Captain Haddock!

Jan van den Ende                                                                    February 16, 2013

Queen Elizabeth Blended Whisky Review

*This is a picture of a bottle of the Queen Elizabeth NAS I found on the German site called Wein und Whisky Raritaeten. The only other picture available was the Group picture you will find below. The Queen Elizabeth NAS is the Johnnie Walker lookalike bottle on the left side of the picture.

Country: Scotland 

Brand: Queen Elizabeth 

Blended by Burn Brae (Blenders) Ltd., Perth

Type: Blended Scotch Whisky

Age: NAS 

ABV: 43 %

Date: 14/02/2013

Colour: Pale Gold 

Nose: Right after opening the sample tube I thought I got distant hints of Peat Smoke and Leather. But in the glass, the Nose is typically (average) Speyside with Malt, Sherry, Floral Notes, Buttered Toast, Wood and Pencil Shavings, Citrus, Honey, Unripe Pear and Dried Fruits (Currants and Apricot). Tones of young and slightly sharp Grain Alcohol and a light nutty bitterness. I would have liked to find some sweet Fruity notes here. All in all I'm not too impressed.

Palate: Sharp and Spicy delivery with Grains, Nuts, Wet Cardboard Boxes, Green Wood, Honey, Pepper, Orange and Licorice.

Finish: Middle-Long with Honey, Malt, Pepper,Nuts, Grain, Licorice, Wood and this slightly unpleasant bitterness.

I added a bit of water and the Nose gets extra Malt and Honey. You get rid of most of the sharp and bitter tones. The problem is that there's not much else left as well. Still you can experiment with a couple of drops. On the Palate and in the (shorter) Finish the Grain and Licorice start to dominate. 

Rating: 75.5 (out of 100)

Nose: 19 - Taste: 19 - Finish: 18.5 - Overall: 19

General Remarks: The whisky I'm tasting today is part of a box containing six Blended Scotch Whisky samples produced somewhere between 1955 and 1965. They are all named after English and Scottish royalties. This box-set is sold by the Dutch based Rare Whisky Site www.rarewhiskysite.com. I must admit that I could hardly find any information on the whisky I'm tasting today, the Queen Elizabeth. I know it was blended in the old days by a company that was called Burn Brae (Blenders) Ltd of Perth in Scotland. This company does not exist anymore. As far as I could find out, the company merged with - or was incorporated by J & W Hardie Ltd of Edinburgh that in turn was acquired from United Distillers in 1995 by the Japanese owners of the Tomatin Distillery. I'm not sure if the Brand Name Queen Elizabeth was also required at that time or that it's now in the hands of the Diageo Group. Bottles of Queen Elizabeth 5 Years are traded every once in a while via whisky auctions or E-Bay. I also found that you can still buy full bottles of this NAS expression at around 25 US Dollars on a German site called: 

Wein-und-Whisky-Raritaeten.de 

Drinking Experience Neat: Average

Conclusion: I was really excited to start nosing and tasting this Blend of which I only have a small 25 ml. sample. First of all because this whisky was bottled when I was between 3 and 13 years of age! And secondly it's been said and written that Blends in those days were not only much better than today's blends but also vastly superior to many of today's Single Malts. Quite a challenge therefore!

Unfortunately the reality was quite different. The Queen Elizabeth is a very average blended whisky with no specific qualities. It shows the characteristics of a young spirit matured for I would guess 3-5 years in (at least a significant percentage) of third and/or fourth re-fill ex-Sherry Casks. There's some Sherry on the Nose but it's not - or hardly noticeable on the Palate and in the Finish. This blend is not very well balanced and sweet Fresh Fruit and/or Sherry tones are sorely missed. Summing it up, we've got 1 Royalty down but fortunately still 5 to go. Better luck next time!

Jan van den Ende                                                                   February 2013